In this video, Ty Bernicke, CFP®, President & CEO, discusses effective tax minimization strategies for retirement, emphasizing the importance of understanding different income sources and investment types. Learn how to optimize your tax buckets—tax-deferred, tax-free, and non-qualified—to maximize your retirement savings and minimize tax liabilities.
Hello everybody! My name is Ty Bernicke, and I’m going to be talking with you about lowering taxes in retirement with some different effective tax minimization strategies. When you’re tax planning for retirement, it’s really important to look at the collective total of all the different income sources that you might have in retirement, including pension income, Social Security income, if you’re going to be working part-time or if you still have business ownership interest, that will factor into play.
The Importance of Investment Tax Implications
Of course, investments have tax implications as well. The first thing that I want to start off by going over is to help you understand a few variables that will affect the strategies that we’re going to be talking about in a little bit. Imagine for a second if you had to take all the investments that you own and that people in the general public own and you had to place them into three different buckets.
The Three Investment Buckets
Tax-Deferred Bucket
Tax-Free Bucket
Non-Qualified Bucket
Actively managed mutual funds can also be very tax inefficient in this bucket. Balance mutual funds that have a mixture of stocks and bonds can be very tax inefficient as well. There actually is something that you can find through a company called Morningstar that discloses the tax cost ratio of certain types of investments. It’s not uncommon to see many mutual funds with a tax cost ratio of 1.5%. 1.5% essentially means that if you made 8% before tax, after taxes you’d only make 6.5% because 1.5% of that is going to pay the tax man at the end of the year.
Illustrating Tax Cost Impact
In this example, I made this to help illustrate over the course of retirement how important it is to keep that tax cost ratio at a reasonable level. Assuming we started with a $500,000 investment that had a 1.5% tax cost ratio and assuming that investment grew at 8% for 30 years, this is the amount of money you’d have if you simply did a different investment that grew at the same rate but had a slightly lower tax cost ratio. You can see it makes a big difference in the bottom line—approximately $700,000 over a 30-year time horizon.
Importance of Investment Placement
So again, I wanted to help illustrate why it’s so important to own the right types of investments in the non-qualified market; it can have a very meaningful impact over the course of your retirement.If you’re looking for personalized advice or would like more information about optimizing your retirement strategy, feel free to reach out!
Have retirement questions?
Schedule a quick 15-minute call with one of our financial advisors to discuss your most pressing questions related to retirement: bernicke.com/consultations
You can also reach us directly at (866) 832-1173.
Content in this material is for general information only and not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. All investing involves risk including loss of principal. No strategy assures success or protects against loss.